Prices recorded from retailers are for guidance: they may have changed since, and the current price is the one shown by the retailer. No price is shown for models sold only on Amazon. Amounts converted from reference prices in euros using an exchange rate from a specified date.

The model counts and analyses describe the shared product catalogue. They do not reflect the offers available in this country. Displayed prices come from verified local offers.

In 2 questions

Which robot vacuum brand suits your needs?

Describe your situation, and we will compare your needs with the figures for each brand.

Your budget

The compared brands in figures

Brand	Models tracked	Median price	Half of the models	Our analyses
Cecotec	48	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.6/10 based on 1
Ecovacs	44	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.6/10 out of 1
Dreame	43	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8/10 out of 2
Eziclean	32	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.8/10 out of 2
iRobot	31	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.9/10 out of 1
Eufy	27	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8/10 out of 2
Xiaomi	25	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.6/10 based on 1
Roborock	24	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	9/10 based on 1
Philips	22	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.3/10 based on 1
Rowenta	20	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.4/10 based on 1
Mova	19	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.5/10 based on 1
Lefant	15	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.4/10 out of 1
Ezviz	14	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.5/10 out of 2
Medion	14	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.4/10 out of 2
Shark	13	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.9/10 out of 2
Airrobo	11	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.4/10 out of 1
Amibot	10	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.9/10 out of 1
Eureka	10	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	9.5/10 out of 1
Liectroux	10	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8/10 out of 2
Narwal	10	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	9.1/10 out of 2
Tapo	10	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.6/10 out of 2
Zaco	9	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.3/10 out of 1
H.Koenig	8	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.3/10 out of 2
Proscenic	8	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.6/10 out of 2
Vactidy	8	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.1/10 out of 2
Electrolux	7	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.4/10 out of 2
Hoover	7	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.8/10 out of 2
Neato	7	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.7/10 out of 1
Ultenic	7	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.3/10 out of 1
Sichler	6	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.2/10 out of 2
Bissell	5	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.4/10 out of 1
Hobot	5	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.8/10 out of 1
Honiture	5	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8/10 out of 1
ILIFE	5	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	6.9/10 out of 1
Miele	5	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.2/10 out of 2
Tesvor	5	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.7/10 out of 1
Bosch	4	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.8/10 out of 2
Domoova	4	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.1/10 out of 2
Kärcher	4	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8/10 out of 2
Laresar	4	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.2/10 out of 2
Midea	4	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8/10 out of 1
Samsung	4	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.4/10 out of 2
CREATE	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.6/10 out of 1
DJI	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.5/10 out of 1
Dyson	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.6/10 out of 1
LG	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.3/10 out of 2
Nedis	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.9/10 based on 1
OKP	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.1/10 based on 1
Vexilar	3	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.7/10 based on 3
Neatsvor	2	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	not yet analysed
Thomson	2	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.5/10 based on 2
Vileda	2	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.9/10 out of 1
Vonko	1	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	8.1/10 out of 1
Vorwerk	1	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	not yet analysed
Weasy	1	Local price not documented	Local price not documented	7.1/10 out of 1

Click a header to sort the table.

Prices recorded on retailer pages. The middle column excludes the cheapest quarter and the most expensive quarter: it describes the brand's typical range, not its extremes. The last column only shows a rating for brands for which we have published at least one analysis: we publish two to three analyses per day, so this column fills up over the weeks.

Which robot vacuum brand should you choose for your needs

Your situation	The brand to consider	Why
You want the best overall performance	Narwal	median score of 9.1/10 across 2 published analyses, the highest in the comparison
You have a tight budget	Liectroux	the most affordable positioning among brands with substantial representation
You are looking for a premium option	Miele	the highest price positioning in the comparison
You want the widest choice	Cecotec	48 models tracked, one of the largest ranges
Suction power is your main criterion	Vexilar	median suction power of 8000 Pa, 60% higher than the rest of the market

What each robot vacuum brand offers

Cecotec

48 models tracked in the range
affordable to mid-range positioning
median score of 8.6/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Ecovacs

44 models tracked in the range
high-end positioning
median score of 7.6/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Dreame

43 models tracked in the range
mid-range to high-end positioning
median score of 8/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Eziclean

32 models tracked in the range
mid-range positioning
median score of 7.8/10 across 2 published analyses
noise level 15% lower than the rest of the market (55 dB versus 65 dB)
distinctive technology with app compatibility

iRobot

31 models tracked in the catalogue
mid-range to high-end positioning
median score of 7.9/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Eufy

27 models tracked in the catalogue
affordable to mid-range positioning
median score of 8/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Xiaomi

25 models tracked in the catalogue
affordable to mid-range positioning
median score of 7.6/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Roborock

24 models tracked in the catalogue
high-end to premium positioning
median score of 9/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Philips

22 models tracked in the catalogue
mid-range positioning
median score of 8.3/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Rowenta

20 models tracked in the catalogue
affordable to mid-range positioning
median score of 7.4/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Mova

19 models tracked in the catalogue
mid-range to high-end positioning
median score of 7.5/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Lefant

15 models tracked in the catalogue
affordable to mid-range positioning
median score of 8.4/10 across 1 published analysis
no significant difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Ezviz

14 models tracked in the catalogue
mid-range positioning
median score of 8.5/10 across 2 published analyses
no significant difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Medion

14 models tracked in the catalogue
entry-level positioning
median score of 7.4/10 across 2 published analyses
suction power 46% lower than the rest of the market (2700 Pa versus 5000 Pa)
runtime 20% shorter than the rest of the market (120 min versus 150 min)

Shark

13 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.9/10 across 2 published analyses
runtime 27% shorter than the rest of the market (110 min versus 150 min)
distinctive features: Mopping, Pet cleaning, Automatic emptying station

Airrobo

11 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.4/10 across 1 published analysis
no significant difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Amibot

10 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.9/10 across 1 published analysis
no significant difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Eureka

10 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 9.5/10 across 1 published analysis
no significant difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Liectroux

10 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Narwal

10 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 9.1/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Tapo

10 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.6/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Zaco

9 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.3/10 from 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

H.Koenig

8 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.3/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Proscenic

8 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.6/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Vactidy

8 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.1/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Electrolux

7 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.4/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Hoover

7 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.8/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Neato

7 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.7/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Ultenic

7 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.3/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Sichler

6 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.2/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Bissell

5 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.4/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Hobot

5 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.8/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Honiture

5 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

ILIFE

5 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 6.9/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Miele

5 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.2/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Tesvor

5 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.7/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Bosch

4 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.8/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Domoova

4 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.1/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Kärcher

4 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8/10 across 2 published analyses
battery life 20% shorter than the rest of the market (120 min versus 150 min)

Laresar

4 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.2/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Midea

4 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Samsung

4 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.4/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

CREATE

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.6/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

DJI

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.5/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Dyson

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.6/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

LG

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.3/10 across 2 published analyses
battery life 33% shorter than the rest of the market (100 min versus 150 min)

Nedis

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.9/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

OKP

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.1/10 across 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Vexilar

3 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.7/10 across 3 published analyses
60% greater suction power than the rest of the market (8000 Pa versus 5000 Pa)

Neatsvor

2 models tracked in the catalogue
no model from this brand has been analysed yet
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Thomson

2 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.5/10 across 2 published analyses
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Vileda

2 models tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.9/10 from 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Vonko

1 model tracked in the catalogue
median score of 8.1/10 from 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Vorwerk

1 model tracked in the catalogue
no model from this brand has been analysed yet
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Weasy

1 model tracked in the catalogue
median score of 7.1/10 from 1 published analysis
no notable difference compared with the rest of the robot vacuum market

Frequently asked questions about robot vacuum brands

What is the best robot vacuum brand?

Among the brands for which we have published several analyses, Narwal has the highest median score (9.1/10 across 2 analyses), ahead of Bosch (8.8/10). This score compares technical specifications across the entire catalogue, rather than brand reputation. Brands we have not yet analysed are not included in this answer: they will be added as we publish more analyses.

Which robot vacuum brand should you choose on a tight budget?

Liectroux has the lowest median price among the well-represented brands, followed by Laresar. At this price level, focus on the features that matter for your terrain rather than the logo.

How many robot vacuum brands are there?

Our comparison covers 55 brands and a total of 603 models. Cecotec has the largest range, with 48 models tracked.

Are all robot vacuum brands equally good?

No, and the differences are measurable. Vexilar, for example, has a median suction power of 8000 Pa, which is 60% higher than the rest of the market. Differences like this should guide your choice, rather than general brand recognition.